Legal Opinion

Britton v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1992No. 91-190PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice, Retired.

During appellant’s jury trial, evidence of prior bad acts was introduced into evidence. In appealing his conviction, appellant urges a single issue:

Did the trial court err in allowing the introduction of evidence concerning prior bad acts of the appellant?

We reverse and remand.

Appellant’s fifteen-year-old son, E.B., testified that in September 1990, he was sexually molested by his father. E.B. stated that his father came home on a lunch break and forced him to participate in anal intercourse. Appellant’s son later reported the incident to the authorities and appellant…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. Larry Allen MyersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  2. United States v. Glennon E. Engleman, United States of America v. Robert Handy, United States of America v. Glennon E. EnglemanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  3. Bishop v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Goodman v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  5. United States v. Alan Neal ScottCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Rivera v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Frenzel v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. McIntoshWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. James v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Griswold v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API