Legal Opinion

DiSepio v. Helmetag

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided August 16, 1978No. 161Published

1Opinion of the Court

WILSON, J.,

— After trial held before me on August 2, 1978,1 make the following findings of fact and conclusion of law:

*108FINDINGS OF FACT

1. On June 26,1967, plaintiffs Daniel N. DiSepio and Rosemary M. DiSepio executed an agreement of sale on lot 16 on a plan of subdivision prepared by Israel Sarota, surveyor and regulator of the ninth district dated June 22, 1967, containing certain frontages on Caldonia Street.

2. On June 26, 1967, plaintiffs Daniel DiSepio, Sr. and Catherine J. DiSepio executed an agreement of sale on lot 15 on a plan of subdivision prepared by Israel Sarota, surveyor and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shady AvenueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API