Robinson & Shanks v. Pearce

Plaintiff in his petition as amended alleged in substance the following: In a mule trade between himself and defendants, a partnership dealing in live stock, the latter valued a pair of mules owned by them at five hundred dollars, for which plaintiff gave his two mules valued at three hundred and fifty dollars, and executed to them his promissory note for one hundred and fifty dollars. At the time of the bargain it was agreed by defendants that if the mules delivered to plaintiff “did not gait and match to suit him and prove satisfactory in every respect” he could return them to defendants…