Legal Opinion

United States v. Aircraft

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided December 21, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-00280-WMAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WILLIAM M. ACKER, JR., District Judge.

Before the court is the motion of plaintiff, the United States of America (“United States”), for summary judgment pursuant *1245to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P. Doc. 22. The United States filed this civil action pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1595a, alleging that the named in rem defendant properties, the Douglas AD-4N Skyraider Aircraft (“aircraft”), the four (4) 20 mm cannons (“cannons”), and the assorted aircraft parts (“aircraft parts”) (collectively, the “defendant properties”), were each introduced into the United States contrary to law, and thus, are…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Property, Parcel of Francisco Aguilar, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  2. United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. an Antique Platter of GoldDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  4. United States v. One Beechcraft King Air 300 AircraftCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. One Lucite Ball Containing Lunar MaterialDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. 323 "Quintales" of Green Coffee BeansDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2013
  2. United States v. AdamsDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API