Semaan v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtCasey, J.
Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims (Hanifin, J.), entered March 30, 1992, which granted the State’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the claim.
Prior to July 18, 1990, Executive Law § 296 (3-a) (f) provided that the Human Rights Law did not prevent the compulsory retirement of an employee who had attained the age of 70 and was serving under a contract for unlimited tenure at an institution of higher education.* The Board of Trustees of the State University of New York at Binghamton (hereinafter SUNY-B) had a policy which required that tenured members of the academic staff…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Austin v. Board of Higher EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Faillace v. Port AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Abramson v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Oneida County Deputy Sheriff's Benevolent Ass'n v. HasenauerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988