Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rosado v. DaimlerChrysler Financial Services Trust

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 4, 2013No. SC09-390Published

1DissentLabarga, J.

I respectfully dissent. Section 324.021(9)(b)(l) imposes financial responsibility upon DaimlerChrysler and liability for failure to meet financial responsibility requirements under Florida law. There*1172fore, the statute is not preempted by the Graves Amendment.

Section 324.021(9)(b)(l) provides that a lessor who, pursuant to an agreement, leases a motor vehicle for one year or longer and requires the lessee to obtain a minimum amount of insurance shall not be deemed the owner of said motor vehicle for the purpose of determining financial responsibility. In this case, the executed lease was for a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ady v. American Honda Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1996
  2. Vargas v. Enterprise Leasing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2011
  3. Rosado v. Daimlerchrysler Financial Services TrustDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API