Legal Opinion

County of St. Louis v. St. Paul & Duluth Railroad

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 12, 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Proceeding in the district court for St. Louis county, to enforce payment of delinquent real-estate taxes against the property described in the opinion. The railroad company answered, and, on a stipulation of facts, the cause was heard by Stearns, J.,. who, ordered judgment against the property, and thereupon certified the case to this court.

1Opinion of the Court

Collins, J.1

This case was certified up by the district court as authorized by Gen. St. 1878, c. 11, § 80. It must be determined by an application to the admitted facts of the principles enunciated in County of Ramsey v. Chicago, Mil. & St. Paul Ry. Co., 33. Minn. 537, (24 N. W. Rep. 313;) County of Todd v. St. Paul, M. & M. Ry. Co., 38 Minn. 163, (36 N. W. Rep. 109;) City of St. Paul v. St. Paul, M. & M. Ry. Co., 39 Minn. 112, (38 N. W. Rep. 925;) County of Hennepin v. St. Paul, M. & M. Ry. Co., 42 Minn. 238, (44 N. W. Rep. 63.) These facts, concisely stated, are, that respondent railway…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. County of Ramsey v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  2. County of Todd v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  3. City of St. Paul v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  4. County of Hennepin v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  2. State v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  3. In re Erie RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API