Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Wiley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 26, 1987No. BO-309Published

1ConcurrenceNimmons, Judge

In view of the per se rule recently adopted by the Florida Supreme Court in Taylor v. State, 498 So.2d 943 (Fla.1986) and reaffirmed in Brooks v. State, 507 So.2d 606 (Fla.1987), we have no choice but to reverse and remand for a new trial because of the failure of the trial court to order the sequestration of the jury in this routine, garden variety burglary case.

This rule mandates reversal even though there may be no indication of a violation by the jurors of thorough and explicit admonitions by the trial judge and regardless of the absence of any prejudice to the defendant occasioned by the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Tascano v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  3. Florida Bar re Amendment to Rules—Criminal ProcedureSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  4. Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  5. Florida BarSupreme Court of Florida · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API