Legal Opinion

Hicks v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 7, 1930PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

Tom Hicks prosecutes this appeal to reverse a judgment of conviction for the crime of uttering a forg'ed instrument. There is no bill of exceptions, and the sole reliance for a reversal of the judgment is that the court erred in overruling the defendant’s motion in arrest of judgment. Under our statute, a judgment can only be arrested on the ground that the facts alleged in the indictment did not constitute a public offense within the jurisdiction of the court. Dover v. State, 165 Ark. 496, 265 S. W. 76; and Lewis v. State, 169 Ark. 340, 275 S. W. 663.

The indictment contains the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dover v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  2. Lewis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  3. Ferrel v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Riley v. Decoulos (In Re American Bridge Products, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
  2. George v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  3. Sutton v. McClainSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  4. New Waterford Bank v. GoodwinOhio Court of Appeals · 1962
  5. Sutton v. McClainSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API