Legal Opinion

de Figuerola v. McGraw-Hill Publishing Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1947Published

1Opinion of the CourtPecora, J.

The amended complaint states a cause of action for libel. It does not allege any special damages, and defendant now moves to dismiss it as insufficient. The action is based upon the publication of a photograph of plaintiff in connection with an article in a publication called “ Business Week ”, which falsely identified plaintiff as the “ Spanish-born Argentine citizen, Jose Figuerola ”, who is stated to be the Director of Argentine’s Five-Year Plan. The amended complaint was served after the original complaint was dismissed by Mr. Justice Hecht (189 Misc. 840, 842). The present pleading has…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Balabanoff v. Hearst Consolidated Publications, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1945
  2. de Figuerola v. McGraw-Hill Publishing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API