Legal Opinion
Arendall v. Dutton
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided February 5, 1987No. Civ. A. No. 3:87-0052PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION, FINDING AND ORDERS
NEESE, Senior District Judge sitting by designation.
The petitioner Mr. William David Aren-dall applied pro se to this Court for the federal writ of habeas corpus. He claims he is in the custody of the respondent-warden pursuant to the judgment of conviction and sentence of October 23, 1972 of the Criminal Court of Tennessee for its (now) 20th judicial district (comprising Davidson County) in violation of the federal Constitution, Sixth Amendment, Right to the Assistance of Counsel Clause, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241(c)(3), 2254(a).
Mr. Arendall concedes that the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Moore v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hawaii Housing Authority v. MidkiffSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bobby Brewer v. Eric G. DahlbergCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Papenfus v. TibbalsDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2003