Legal Opinion

Biggs v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 2, 1913No. Gen. No. 5,671PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Peoria county; the Hon. Leslie D. Puterbatjgh, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the April term, 1913. Certiorari denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dibell

Appellant operates a railway across the Illinois River at Peoria and thence southeasterly for a number of miles. It is a double track road after it leaves the bridge. Appellant built a new bridge eight feet higher than the old one. It became necessary, in order to get upon the new bridge, to raise the tracks for a long distance. This railway was used by various other railways besides appellant, and one hundred trains per day passed over these tracks. The tracks were raised without stopping the operation of the railroad. The method pursued was as follows: A quantity of material would be placed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Springfield Boiler & Manufacturing Co. v. ParksIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  2. James S. Kirk & Co. v. JajkoIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Phillips v. BenfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Alpe v. Superior Coal Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1917
  2. Dunlap v. Brotherhood of Railway TrainmenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1919
  3. Muenter v. Moline Plow Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1915
  4. Scofield v. Wabash Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API