Legal Opinion

Monarch Beverage Co., Inc. v. Dale Grubb

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 30, 2017No. 15-3440PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SYKES, Circuit Judge.

We are again asked to decide whether an aspect of Indiana’s alcohol regulation system violates the Equal Protection Clause. Two years, ago we upheld an *680Indiana law that prohibits grocery and convenience stores from selling chilled beer. See Indiana Petroleum Marketers & Convenience Store Ass’n v. Cook, 808 F.3d 318 (7th Cir. 2015). In this case Monarch Beverage Company challenges a feature of Indiana’s “prohibited interest” law that separates beer and liquor wholesaling by prohibiting beer wholesalers from holding an interest in a liquor-distribution permit. See Ind. Code…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Valenti v. LawsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  2. St. Joan Antida High School In v. Milwaukee Public School DistriCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  3. Minerva Dairy, Inc. v. HarsdorfCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  4. Paramount Media Group, Inc. v. Village of BellwoodCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  5. A.H. ex rel. Holzmueller v. Illinois High School Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API