Rogers v. People
Supreme Court of Colorado
1DissentChief Justice Hilliard
Although I am not satisfied that other points urged by plaintiff in error have been rightly resolved, I comment only upon his contentions: (1) That section 262, chapter 48, ’35 C. S. A., under which the prosecution proceeded, is without application to county commissioners or to their acts in relation to the discharge of their duties; and, (2) that a remark of the court during the trial was materially prejudicial. The statute and indictment are quoted in the opening of the court opinion.
1. County commissioners, three for each county, are constitutional officers. Art. XIV, § 6, Constitution;…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. WiltbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
- State v. KrugWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Robbins v. County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
- State v. LovellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
- Moore v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.