Legal Opinion
People v. King
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 23, 2011PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum:
On appeal from a judgment convicting him following a jury trial of grand larceny in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 155.30 [4]), defendant contends that the evidence is legally insufficient to establish that he stole the victim’s wallet that contained, inter alia, a debit card. We reject that contention. According to the evidence presented at trial, the wallet was stolen from the victim at a convenience store, where she was working as a cashier. There was overwhelming evidence presented at trial that defendant entered the store shortly before the victim discovered that her wallet…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. DanielsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. SteinbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. CareyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. WittmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. RomanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. KaminskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- KAMINSKI, STANLEY A., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.