Legal Opinion · Dissent

Langan v. State Farm Fire & Casualty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 27, 2007Published

1Dissent

Rose, J. (dissenting).

I respectfully dissent as to the majority’s conclusion that the doctrine of comity does not require New York to recognize claimant as decedent’s surviving spouse for purposes of the death benefits afforded by Workers’ Compensation Law § 16 (1-a).

While I certainly agree that the valid Vermont civil union entered into by claimant and decedent does not bind us to confer upon them “all of the incidents which the other jurisdiction attaches to such status” (Matter of Chase, 127 AD2d 415, 417 [1987]), claimant is not seeking such an incident here. He does not ask us to confer…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Claim of Valentine v. American AirlinesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. In re the Estate of ChaseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Claim of Lashlee v. Pepsi-Cola Newburgh BottlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API