Legal Opinion

La Bounty v. Brumback

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1933No. 23525PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephenson, J.

A number of errors are assigned by plaintiff in error herein. They will be considered in inverse order.

Is the case improperly brought?

Counsel is correct in quoting Section 8510, G-eneral Code,- to the effect that contracts involving the sale of real estate or an interest therein must be in writing and signed by the person parting with the title or possession. It is likewise the law that a lease for more than three years must be attested and acknowledged.

This was an action for money and an accounting only. It was tried to the court. The trial court heard the evidence, and dismissed La Bounty’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Morris v. . HenryNew York Court of Appeals · 1917

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Lien v. HouseOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Hodges v. EttingerOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Spectrum Benefit Options, Inc. v. Medical MutualOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Kemp v. FeldmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. Herman v. Ohio Finance Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1940

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API