Legal Opinion
United States v. Johnson
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided July 31, 1996No. 94-2149PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWARZER, Senior District Judge:
Rule 11(e)(1) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure directs that the district court will not participate in any discussions to reach a plea agreement. Appellant Gary Lorenzo Johnson contends that the district court violated this injunction. We reject the contention, and other claims asserted, and affirm.
Proceedings Below
On the eve of trial, Johnson pled guilty to two counts of an eight-count indictment: count one, charging conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 50 grams of crack, and count five, charging possession of five or more grams of crack…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Steve Paul Wilson, A/K/A Mike L. Wilson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Rahn Kristopher Willis, A/K/A Darin Andre SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. James Edwards AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. James Buckles, A/K/A Jimmy BucklesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Kenneth R. BruceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- United States v. BierdCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Lauro Puentes-HurtadoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- United States v. TobinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Carmichael Cannady, A/K/A StokeyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. CheneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.