Legal Opinion

Mecartney v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1916PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Writ op Error to the Branch “B” Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Richard S. Tut-hill, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cartwright

On December 13, 1912, the plaintiff in error, Harry S. Mecartney, commenced an action of trespass on the case in the circuit court of Cook county against the defendant in error, the city of Chicago, to recover damages for the alleged negligence of the defendant in error in failing to levy and collect special assessments to pay the compensation awarded in a proceeding to acquire property for.use as a street, to him and other owners whose rights he had acquired, which property the defendant in error took possession of and devoted to the uses of a street on September 1, 1893, and of which it had…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Appleton Water Works Co. v. Railroad CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  2. City of Elgin v. EatonIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Geohegan v. Union Elevated RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  4. City of Chicago v. BarbianIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Winkelman v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1904

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Feldman v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Turk v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  3. City of Chicago v. RothIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
  4. University of Chicago v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1930
  5. Feldman v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API