Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Villanueva

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 30, 2008No. PD-1836-06PublishedCited by 263 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · KeaslerKeasler, J.

The court of appeals held that it did not have jurisdiction over Armando Quintana Villanueva’s appeal from the trial judge’s decision to deny his Article 11.072 application for a writ of habeas corpus as frivolous because the trial judge refused to consider the merits of Villanueva’s claims. 1 We reverse the court of appeals’s decision and remand this case so that the court can determine whether it has jurisdiction to consider Villanueva’s appeal under Article, 11.072, Section 8, which governs the right to appeal. 2

Background

In 2000, Villanueva pled guilty to the Class A misdemeanor…

3Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Ex Parte HargettCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Ex Parte RenierCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  4. Ex Parte McCulloughCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  5. Ex Parte CarrioCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by263 opinions

  1. Torres, Ex Parte ManuelCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
  2. Ex Parte Devan S. Matthews, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2014
  3. Ex Parte Mello, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
  4. Ex Parte Jessep, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2009
  5. Keaton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2009

258 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API