Legal Opinion
Gordon H. Mitchell v. Roy P. Parham and Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 25, 1966No. 8340_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SETH, Circuit Judge.
The appellant had previously filed an appeal in this court which was dismissed because the order upon which it was based was not an appealable order. Upon remand, plaintiff was given an opportunity to amend his complaint if he desired te do so, but if no amendment was made it was directed that a final order of dismissal be entered. Appellant did not amend, and the trial court entered an order dismissing the action. It is from this order that the appellant now appeals.
Appellant had sought a license as a sales agent for a liquor wholesaler from the Alcoholic Beverage Control…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Gibbs v. BuckSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Levering & Garrigues Co. v. MorrinSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Siloam Springs Hotel, L.L.C. v. Century Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- C. L. Whitelock v. Delbert LeathermanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- Mountain Fuel Supply Company, a Utah Corporation, and Cross-Appellant v. Reland Johnson, and Johnson Oil Company, Inc., and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- Sundance Mechanical & Utility Corp. v. AtlasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- Oppenheim v. SterlingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.