Legal Opinion

State v. Williams

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 3, 1984No. 83-1412Published

1Per curiam

The appellee, through counsel, concedes that the trial court erred in granting the defendant’s sworn motion to dismiss the information charging him with second degree grand theft. See State v. Pena-Salazar, 405 So.2d 254 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Quarterman v. State, 401 So.2d 1159 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

Following the confession of error the ap-pellee, through counsel, certified a conflict and moved to withdraw. This court took under advisement the motion to withdraw and granted the appellee an additional thirty days in which to file a supplemental brief, either personally or through counsel. No brief…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Quarterman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. State v. Pena-SalazarDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API