Legal Opinion

Highwarden v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 7, 1993No. A14-92-00469-CRPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

J. CURTISS BROWN, Chief Justice.

The appellant was charged by information with the offense of driving while intoxicated. After the trial court overruled her motion to suppress evidence, the appellant entered a plea of nolo contendere. The trial court assessed punishment at 180 days confinement, probated for two years, and a $400 fine. The appellant raises five points of error arguing the trial court erred by overruling her motion to suppress. We affirm.

The appellant alleges the evidence was insufficient to support the trial court’s findings of reasonable suspicion to detain, and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Russell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Maddox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. Gordon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  5. Tolentino v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Richards v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
  2. Blondett v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996
  3. Crivello v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999
  4. Telshow v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  5. McClain v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API