Wright v. Wright

Clay, Commissioner

Affirming.

This is the third time these parties have been before this Court in a controversy involving two tracts of land. Appellees, the heirs of James Wright, originally sued to recover of appellant the value of timber allegedly cut by him on this property.. The first judgment was reversed for error in the instructions. Halcomb et al. v. Simpson, 301 Ky. 55, 190 S. W. 2d 855. On a second appeal the judgment was reversed because the evidence indicated some of the appellees were estopped to claim damages. Simpson v. Halcomb et al., 307 Ky. 228, 210 S. W. 2d 758.

While the…