Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Florida Bar v. Jennings

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 6, 1986No. 66398Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partEhrlich, Justice

I concur as to respondent’s guilt and dissent as to the appropriateness of the discipline.

In summary form, these are the findings of fact by the referee. Respondent borrowed $30,000 from each of two sets of in-laws, and prepared, filed and had recorded a .mortgage and note for each in-law purportedly encumbering the same parcel of property for security. Neither in-law knew about the respondent’s deal with the other and neither knew about the mortgage to the other. Each in-law took out a second mortgage on his home in order to get the funds with which to make the temporary loan to respondent.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Florida Bar v. AdamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API