Legal Opinion

Muller v. Spreckels

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 20, 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Admiralty. Libel by Victor H. Muller, master of the steam-ship Eugenie, against Claus Sprockels to recover freight. The gross freight was 87,587.72, which bad been paid less tbe following deductions: Entrance fee, $5; custom-house fees, $1.40; tug-boat services delivering orders, $2: wharf-age, $225; stevedore, $1,421.61; advertising, $5.95; stationery, etc., $10; “attendance” fee, $50; commission, $190.82; short delivery, §12.07.

1Opinion of the CourtButler, J.

The libel is for freight, under charter-party — for carrying sugar. The amount earned is $7,682.80. The charter provides that “the ship shall pay charterer’s agent at port of discharge a commission of two and a half per cent, on gross freight,” and that the ship “shall be addressed at tbe port of discharge to the charterer or his agent for custom-house business, on the usual terms.” The cargo was to be delivered at Philadelphia, “along-side store or into craft or steamer at wharf, pier, or on cars, always afloat,” as ordered. On the ship’s arrival controversy arose respecting the appointment…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Beard v. Marine Lighterage Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1924
  2. George W. Bush & Sons Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1895
  3. A/S D/S Mathilda v. Bethlehem Steel Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API