Legal Opinion

Supe v. Francis

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1882PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Bay. Debt on bond. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, C. J.

This action was brought upon a bond made by the first defendant as principal and the second defendant as surety to the plaintiff, Supe, under the third subdivision of section 10 of chapter 141 of the Revised Statutes of 1846 for the punishment of fraudulent debtors. 2 Comp. L. ch. 230.*

The plaintiff gave in evidence the bond and all the proceedings had before the commissioner under said chapter, and the circuit judge directed a verdict for the plaintiff.

The defendants claim that the showing on which the arrest was made and which was the foundation of the subsequent proceedings, including the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Swart v. KimballMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Cadwell v. ColgateNew York Supreme Court · 1849
  3. Broadhead v. McConnellNew York Supreme Court · 1848
  4. Vredenburgh v. HendricksNew York Supreme Court · 1853
  5. Badger v. ReadeMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Marks v. SullivanUtah Supreme Court · 1893
  2. State v. KellerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API