State v. Houvener
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSchultheis, C.J.
¶1 Jacob Sterling Houvener, a student at Washington State University, was charged with residential burglary. Relying on his Fourth Amendment presentation, the trial court suppressed the State’s evidence.1 We conclude that the evidence was properly suppressed because it was unlawfully obtained by police when an officer conducted a building-wide search of the interior hallways of the dormitory without a warrant. We therefore affirm.
FACTS
¶2 According to the trial court’s unchallenged findings of fact, at about 5:45 a.m. on February 11, 2006, Washington State University Police Officer Matthew…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. RodriguezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Wagner v. HoltzappleDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- State v. LazcanoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Milam v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2015
- State Of Washington v. William R. PippinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.