Busino v. Meachem
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Mugglin, J.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Kramer, J.), entered September 28, 1998 in Schenectady County, which granted certain defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them.
Finding no triable issues of fact, Supreme Court granted summary judgment to defendant Richard M. Antokol and his law firm, defendant Antokol and Coffin (hereinafter collectively referred to as defendants), dismissing the first, second, third and sixth causes of action alleged in plaintiffs complaint. Plaintiff appeals alleging that defendants failed to establish a prima facie…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Prudential Insurance v. Dewey, Ballantine, Bushby, Palmer & WoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- GTF Marketing, Inc. v. Colonial Aluminum Sales, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Graubard Mollen Dannett & Horowitz v. MoskovitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Fleet Bank v. Pine Knoll Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Tabner v. DrakeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Ironforge. Com v. Paychex, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2010
- Antokol v. MyersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Ehlinger v. Ruberti, Girvin & Ferlazzo, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.