Legal Opinion

Lane v. New York Life Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 19, 1928No. 12510PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Carter.

The plaintiffs, Mamie M. Lane and Joe P. Lane, instituted two actions against the defendant, New York Life Insurance Company, in the Court of Common Pleas for Dillon County, for the reinstatement of two policies, Nos. 6926302 and 6926303, in the defendant company, issued upon the life of the plaintiff, Joe P. Lane, with Mamie M. Lane, his wife and co-plaintiff, named as the beneficiary in the policies, each policy- being for the sum of $3,000. The pleadings in the cases are practically the same, and, by agreement, the cases were…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance v. StathamSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Klein v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Post v. . WeilNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Antley v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  5. Merchants Bank v. GarrardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Premium Investment Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  2. Regions Bank v. Wingard Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
  3. Elliott v. SnyderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  4. Illinois Bankers Life Ass'n of Monmouth v. PalmerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Haselden v. Standard Mutual Life Ass'nSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API