Legal Opinion

MITSUI LINES LTD. v. CSX Intermodal, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided July 11, 2008No. Case 08-20974-CIVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND; (2) DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE DECLARATION; AND (3) REMANDING CASE

PATRICIA A. SEITZ, District Judge.

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Plaintiffs Motion for Remand [DE-3] and Plaintiffs Motion to Strike Declaration of Hyman Hillenbrand [DE-11]. Plaintiff argues that Defendants did not timely satisfy the unanimity requirements for removal. Having reviewed the pending motions, the responses and replies, and the record as a whole, the Court will grant Plaintiffs Motion for Remand [DE-3], deny as moot Plaintiffs Motion to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

Getty Oil Corporation, Succeeded by and a Division of Texaco, Inc. v. Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
Jeffrey D. Brierly, Administrator of the Estate of Paul Brierly v. Alusuisse Flexible Packaging, Inc. David EllisonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
Billy Max Brown v. Demco, Inc. v. Employers Casualty Co., Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
Russell Corp. v. American Home Assurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
William O’Neal WHITT, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SHERMAN INT’L CORP., Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.