Hunt v. . Maybee
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from the Supreme Court, sitting in the first district, where judgment had been entered upon a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. This was an action of assumpsit against the defendant, as indorser of two promissory notes, made by Jacob Ferdon, dated at the city of New York, and payable at six months.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Supreme Court, sitting in the first district, where judgment had been entered upon a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. This was an action of assumpsit against the defendant, as indorser of two promissory notes, made by Jacob Ferdon, dated at the city of New York, and payable at six months. One of them, bearing date the 30th October 1843, was signed, “ Jacob Ferdon, tailor, 194 Clinton streetthe other, bearing' date the 18th November 1843, was signed, “ Jacob Ferdon.” The defendant’s indorsement was admitted to be genuine; the only question, on the trial, was, whether he had…
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] As the circuit judge before whom this cause was tried, did not permit the plaintiffs to recover upon the certificates of the notary and the notices of protest attached to the same, but compelled them to give farther proof, it is not necessary to notice them farther than to observe that they were void, as the presentment was not made…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Gundlin v. Hamburg-American Packet Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1894
- City of Wyandotte v. NobleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
- Commercial Bank of Kentucky v. . VarnumNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- A. & L. Trading Co. v. Herald Square Bakers & Caterers, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1963
- Harriman v. SangerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1877
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.