Legal Opinion

Condon v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided December 27, 1938No. Claim No. 24773PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreenberg, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the claim herein upon the ground that the claim does not state a cause of action against the State of New York.

The claim alleges that claimant sustained injuries while he was lawfully on the barge Ira T. Bushey on October 24, 1936, by being struck by the lift bridge which extended over the Erie canal at Spencerport, N. Y., while the barge was proceeding on the Erie canal under the said lift bridge; that the injuries were sustained by reason of the carelessness and negligence of the agents, servants and employees of the State of New York in direct charge and control…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Litchfield v. . BondNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. Lewis v. . the StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  3. Locke v. . StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Zorn v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  5. Rexford v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1887

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Glens Falls Insurance v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1947
  2. Arquette v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 2001
  3. Gray v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1954
  4. Marston v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API