Legal Opinion

Contreras, Jonasz & Camacho, P.A. v. Fernandez

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 13, 2010No. 3D10-2201Published

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

Because the wife’s former counsel has demonstrated a clear, unqualified right to the prompt hearing and determination of its application for the adjudication of a charging lien on her recovery in this matrimonial action (as well as of the motion to dismiss that application), see Sinclair, Louis, Siegel, Heath, Nussbaum & Zavertnik, P.A. v. Baucom, 428 So.2d 1383, 1385 (Fla.1983), the petition for mandamus to require that relief is granted. Flagship Nat’l Bank of Miami v. Testa, 429 So.2d 69 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Garcia v. Garcia, 958 So.2d 947, 949 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007);…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sinclair, Etc. & Zavertnik, PA v. BaucomSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  2. Flagship Nat. Bank of Miami v. TestaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. Quintana v. BaradDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. VILLAS AT CUTLER RIDGE HOMEOWNERS'ASSOCIATION v. NewmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  5. Haas v. SpiegelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API