Legal Opinion

U. S. Merchandise Mart, Inc. v. D & H Distributing Co.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 13, 1971No. 5652PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Chief Judge:

This appeal is from a judgment by default entered after appellant’s answer was stricken because of its failure to comply with the order of the court requiring it to file further and more complete answers to interrogatories. In its two-page brief, citing no authorities and not disputing the power of the court to act as it did under its Rule 37(b) (2) (iii), 1 appellant argues that the action of the trial court was erroneous. Its argument appears to be that under the facts here the trial court abused its discretion in imposing too severe a sanction.

The facts were that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States of America for the Use of Weston & Brooker Company, a Corporation v. Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
  2. United States v. LongDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1950

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Braxton v. Howard UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Firestone v. HarrisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Himmelfarb v. GreenspoonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Ungar Motors v. AbdemoulaieDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Vernell v. GouldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API