Ingram v. State

Sognier, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of two charges of receiving a stolen automobile. On appeal he contends (1) that the state failed to prove the value of either automobile; (2) that the evidence does not support Count 1, as it does not establish that appellant knew, or should have known, that the automobile named in Count 1 was stolen; (3) that the trial court’s charges to the jury as to recent possession of stolen property, value of the automobiles and knowledge were erroneous; and (4) that the trial court’s recharge confused the jury.

1. Whether the state did or did not establish the…