Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Engle v. Thompson Murray, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided September 20, 2006No. CA 06-81Published

1ConcurrenceWendell L. Griffen, Judge

“We should not forget as judges what we know as intelligent human beings.” — Matlock v. Arkansas Blue Cross Blue Shield, 74 Ark. App. 322, 341, 49 S.W.3d 126, 140 (2001).

I write separately to state that employers and their carriers should fully expect workers’ compensation law to cover injuries to employees on company retreats and similar outings. It is disingenuous for an employer to set up a company outing, require that its employees attend said outing, then refuse to compensate an employee for injuries sustained at the outing. The denial of benefits is more egregious in the present case…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Claim of Huber v. Eagle Stationery Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  2. Claim of Higgins v. Ronkonkoma Fire DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. Highlands County School Bd. v. SavageDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  4. Trent v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API