Legal Opinion
Arthur Demarest v. Brigitte Kovacevich
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided August 6, 2026No. 3:23-cv-00932Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION ARTHUR DEMAREST, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) NO. 3:23-cv-00932 ) BRIGITTE KOVACEVICH, ) JUDGE CAMPBELL ) MAGISTRATE JUDGE FRENSLEY Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM Pending before the Court is Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Arthur Demarest’s (“Demarest”) Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. No. 170). Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Brigitte Kovacevich (“Kovacevich”) filed a response in opposition (Doc. No. 183-1), and Demarest filed a reply (Doc. No. 185). For the reasons set forth below, Demarest’s Motion for Summary…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Mark Laster v. City of KalamazooCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Donald G. Wexler v. White's Fine Furniture, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Carolyn T. Rodgers v. Elizabeth BanksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.