Legal Opinion
Robinson v. Capital Staffing
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided October 18, 2017No. 17-114PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PICKETT, Judge.
hThe employer in this workers’ compensation suit appeals a judgment that ¿warded the employee penalties and attorney fees against it because the employer improperly suspended the employee’s indemnity benefits after he failed to attend two medical examination appointments that it scheduled. For the following reasons, we reverse the judgment.
FACTS
On October 2, 2015, Junius Robinson filed an LDOL 1008 claim, alleging that he was injured while working in the course and scope of his employment with LA Rice Mill, Inc. and Capital Staffing. These two defendants denied employing Mr.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ross Milling Co. v. GilibertiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
- Louisiana Municipal Association v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
- Valley Securities Co. v. BrazierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
- Brandt v. EngleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
- Smith v. Alliance CompressorsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Robinson v. Capital StaffingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
- Junius Robinson v. Capital Staffing Services, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
- Robinson v. Capital StaffingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019