Croghan v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
ERROR to the Circuit Court of Marathon County. cited Wright v. The State, 4 Iiumph., 194; State v. Bierce, 27 Conn., 320. cited R. S., ch. 164, sec. 39; Wharton’s Crim. Law, 1141; 3 G-reenl. Ev., 210; 5 Sneed, 581; 3 Zab., 30; 29 Conn., 232; 1 Hals., 329; Comm. v. Parr, 5 Watts & S., 345.
1Opinion of the CourtCole, J.
This was an indictment under section 5, chap. 170, R. S., for seduction. The prosecutrix in her testimony states the circumstances under which the sexual intercourse took place. It appears that she was between fifteen and sixteen years of age at the time, and was living with the defendant, who had married her aunt. The girl’s parents lived in Minnesota, and the defendant in Marathon county. The girl states that one night the defendant, during the absence of his wife, came to her room after she had gone to bed, and insisted upon getting into'bed with her — that she resisted, and he choked her…
2Cited by15 opinions
- State v. HameySupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
- Carter v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Marshall v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- State v. EllisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
- Patterson v. HaydenOregon Supreme Court · 1889
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.