In re Katzowitz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Hinman, J.:
The respondent, Arthur Caston, became the' owner of a half interest in a bond and mortgage given to secure the principal sum of $400, which was due and payable August 15, 1922. These instruments were executed by Jacob Peters. When they became due Peters obtained a satisfaction of the same from the owners of the other one-half interest. He also went to the home of Arthur Caston at that time and now claims that Caston was paid in full for his share with interest. He received, however, no satisfaction piece from Caston and. he did not at that time present to Caston a satisfaction…
2Cited by2 opinions
- In re ClarkNew York Supreme Court · 1962
- In re Iratom Co.New York Supreme Court · 1965