Legal Opinion

Board of Education v. Eckert

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 17, 2003PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

CARCHMAN, J.A.D.

The narrow issue that we address on this appeal is whether a property owner-condemnee is responsible for roll-back taxes when the use of such property is changed as a result of a condemnation. We answer that question in the negative and conclude that the condemning authority is responsible for such roll-back taxes. We further conclude that the cessation of farming operations in reasonable anticipation of the ensuing condemnation does not comprise a change of use warranting imposition of the roll-back taxes on the condemnee.

We reach this…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. City of East Orange v. TP. OF LIVINGSTONNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  3. The CITY OF EAST ORANGE v. Township of LivingstonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  4. New Jersey Transit Corp. v. Borough of SomervilleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  5. New Jersey Turnpike Authority v. Township of WashingtonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Save Camden Pub. Sch. v. Camden City Bd. of Educ.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API