Pryor v. Hoskins
Indiana Court of Appeals
1ConcurrenceSullivan, Judge
I agree that the refusal of the trial court to honor the truckers’ peremptory challenge of Ms. Ivy requires reversal and remand for a new trial. However, in doing so, I would proffer a slightly different analysis of the three-pronged basis for the challenge.
The challenge was made upon three grounds:(1) Ivy’s statement that because of two incidents, truck drivers “[are] not my favorite.” Tr. at 33.(2) Ivy recalled knowing Hoskins’s children who sang in Ivy’s church choir and thought of them as social acquaintances.(3) Because Ivy and Hoskins were both very active in their churches, Ivy might…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- JEB v. Alabama Ex Rel. TBSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Thorson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.