Campbell-Jarvis v. Alves
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*702In order to vacate her default in opposing the defendant’s prior motion to dismiss, the plaintiff was required to demonstrate both a reasonable excuse for her default and a meritorious opposition to the motion (see Simpson v Tommy Hilfiger U.S.A., Inc., 48 AD3d 389, 392 [2008]; Hospital for Joint Diseases v Dollar Rent A Car, 25 AD3d 534 [2006]; Fekete v Camp Skwere, 16 AD3d 544, 545 [2005]; Amato v Fast Repair, Inc., 15 AD3d 429, 430 [2005]; Costanza v Gold, 12 AD3d 551, 552 [2004]). Although the determination of what constitutes a reasonable excuse lies within the trial court’s discretion…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Roussodimou v. ZafiriadisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Simpson v. Tommy Hilfiger U.S.A., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Santiago v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Henry v. KuvekeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Fekete v. Camp SkwereAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Bazoyah v. HerschitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. LudenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Remote Meter Technology of NY, Inc. v. Aris Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Vardaros v. ZapasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Archer Capital Fund, L.P. v. Gel, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.