Legal Opinion

Corn v. Target Corporation

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided May 11, 2023No. 1:22-cv-04700Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ZACHARY CORN, Plaintiff, No. 22 CV 4700 v. Judge Lindsay C. Jenkins TARGET CORP., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Zachary Corn brings this putative class action against Defendant Target Corporation (“Target”) for alleged violations of the pre-sale availability rule of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act,

15 U.S.C. § 2301

et seq. (“MMWA”), and its implementing regulations,

16 C.F.R. §§ 700.1

et seq. The MMWA confers a private right of action on consumers who are “damaged by the failure of a supplier,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API