Legal Opinion
Peer v. Peer
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 28, 1959PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArthur G. Klein, J.
The plaintiff wife has brought this action for a separation. The defendant, in addition to general denials, has pleaded in his answer, as a separate and distinct defense, a valid, enforcible separation agreement between the parties.
*879The parties were married in October, 1940. They later separated and the agreement set up in the answer is dated November 1,1955.
By stipulation of counsel there was tried before me only the limited issue of the alleged abandonment of the separation agreement, with the understanding that if it were found to be abandoned the separation action would then be tried.
The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Goldman v. GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Hughes v. . CumingNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Hughes v. CumingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Brody v. BrodyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- Zimtbaum v. ZimtbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Granchelli v. GranchelliNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- Smith v. SmithNew York City Family Court · 1966
- Inre the Estate of WhitefordNew York Surrogate's Court · 1969
- Peer v. PeerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961