Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Block

District Court, D. North Dakota

Decided September 17, 1984No. Civ. A1-83-47PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

VAN SICKLE, District Judge.

On June 15, 1984, this Court issued an order granting attorneys’ fees in the above-entitled action. 589 F.Supp. 1411. Doc. No. 165. According to Rule 4(a)(1), Fed.R.App.P., the United States has sixty days after the entry of an order to file a notice of appeal. This time-period is jurisdictional, Browder v. Director of Department of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 561, 54 L.Ed.2d 521, 531 (1978), and can be extended only “upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause” by a motion filed not later than 30 days after the expiration…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Norman L. Birl v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  4. Thompson v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. United States v. Salvatore Cirami, Salvatore Cirami & Margaret CiramiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lane v. WilliamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
  2. Vogelsang v. Patterson Dental Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
  3. Lane v. WilliamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API