Legal Opinion

Fry v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 11, 1915PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Bullitt Circuit Court. .

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Hannah

Affirming,

The appellants were tried under an indictment returned against them in the Bullitt Circuit Court and found guilty of the offense of stealing ducks of the value of two dollars or more. Their punishment was fixed by the jury at not less than one normore than two years in. the penitentiary. They appeal.

1. The prosecution is under the Act of March 17, 1904, section 1201c, Kentucky Statutes, which provides that if any person shall steal chickens, turkeys, ducks or *671other fowls of the value of two dollars or more,- he shall be confined in the penitentiary…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williams v. WeddingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  2. Bowman v. HamlettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  3. Harper v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1892
  4. Diamond v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Weber v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
  2. Stone v. City of LexingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  3. Lafollette v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1972
  4. McPherson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API