Legal Opinion · Dissent

D'Angelo v. Scoppetta

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 18, 2012Published

1Dissent

Smith, J. (dissenting).

I dissent because I do not think the Assistant Commissioner’s letter to petitioner is a “reprimand” as we interpreted that term in Holt v Board of Educ. of Webutuck Cent. School Dist. (52 NY2d 625 [1981]).

Laws governing the discipline of civil servants, including Administrative Code of the City of New York § 15-113, often require a trial or hearing, with due process protections, before an employee can be given a “reprimand.” If that term were given a broad interpretation, it could make the lives of public employers almost impossible: They would have to go through a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Holt v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Civil Service Employees Ass'n v. Southold Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API