Legal Opinion

Swanson v. Swanson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 1, 1947No. 4-8255PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. E. MoFaddin, Justice.

This is a divorce suit; and the decree of the chancery court must be reversed, and the cause dismissed under the authority of Cassen v. Cassen, 211 Ark. 582, 201 S. W. 2d 585. In that case we held that a plaintiff must be a bona fide resident of Arkansas, and have the animus manendi — that is, he must be domiciled here — before he can invoke the jurisdiction of the courts of this State to obtain a divorce. The proof in the case at bar falls short of this residential requirement.

Joseph Swanson (appellee) and. Maudie Swanson (appellant) were married in Oklahoma in 1925.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cassen v. CassenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  2. Carter Oil Company v. WeilSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  3. Squire v. SquireSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Walters v. WaltersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  2. Stimmel v. StimmelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  3. Warren v. WarrenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  4. Deal v. DealSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  5. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API